SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE BIOLOGY LEARNING OUTCOMES IN HIGH SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/jnsl.v3i2.199Abstract
Education is a crucial aspect in creating high-quality human resources. The appropriate learning model, such as Discovery Learning, plays a vital role in enhancing student learning outcomes, particularly in Biology at the high school level. Discovery Learning emphasizes the process of concept discovery by students through active learning activities, helping them build knowledge independently and meaningfully. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Discovery Learning model in improving high school biology learning outcomes through a systematic literature review using the PRISMA method. The analysis of seven articles that met the criteria shows that Discovery Learning significantly enhances high school students' biology learning outcomes. These findings highlight the effectiveness of Discovery Learning in deepening students' understanding of biological concepts and increasing their motivation.
References
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1-18.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2015). Influence of inquiry-based science instruction on science achievement and interest in science: Evidence from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2499-2522.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Chen, C. H., Lai, C. C., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Students' motivation toward science learning and learning effectiveness in constructivist instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 406-421.
Cheng, R. W. Y., Lam, S. F., & Chan, J. C. Y. (2018). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 56, 133-145.
DeHaan, R. L. (2005). The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2), 253-269.
Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. OECD Publishing.
Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. M. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.
Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27-61.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2012). Lessons learned about implementing an inquiry-based curriculum in a college biology laboratory classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 207-220.
Hanifah, U., & Wasitohadi. (2017). Perbedaan efektivitas antara penerapan model pembelajaran discovery dan inquiry ditinjau dari hasil belajar IPA siswa. E-Jurnal Mitra Pendidikan, 1(2), 92-104.
Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2018). The teaching of science in primary schools (7th ed.). Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Loyens, S. M. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Instruction based on inquiry. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
Prasetyo, T., & Suwandi, S. (2019). Kendala penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning pada pembelajaran teks prosedur di SMA Negeri 4 Surakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 167-177.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2009). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 227-233.
Suardana, I. N., Ratnadi, N. W., & Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R. (2017). Pengaruh model discovery learning berbantuan media audiovisual terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 1-7.
Wahyudi, W., & Siswanti, M. C. (2015). Pengaruh pendekatan saintifik melalui model discovery learning dengan permainan terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas 5 SD. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 5(3), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i3.p23-36
Wati, N. P. S., & Suarni, N. K. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning berbantuan media audiovisual terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Kubu. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 9(1), 34-40.
